Phroneis is the act of rational, reasonable thinking. It is planning ahead one's moral outlook and actions, rather than just living one minute at a time... it is having a firm-rooted, well thought out moral philosophy revolving around virtues and excellence. Phroneis leads one to develope their own conculsions without forcing one to a binding moral code it is like a whisper in one's ear; a weight on his heart. It is a subtle, weak, but binding voice in the deep recesses of one's mind, pushing them towards the proper decision. Aristotle notes that phroneis isn't "more powerful" or imprtant than the other 4 aspects, one needs to be a balanced, well-rounded person.
I think that both Hurthouse and Aristolte see the faults in having one, unbinding, isuue-specific outlook on morality. Hurthouse notes that in some cases, abortion may be justified in virtue theory, in others, not so much. I believe this holds true to Aristotle's justification of virtue theory. My only qualm is that it is hard, a bit too hard, to justify a "moral reason" or a virtue at times.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment